Numbering in programs

SDS

Can we get some consistent numbering in programs. For instance, the Stage 1 affinities are through 70, the stage 2 through 50, but the entire thing is 120. Can we just keep the number the same through stages? Same goes for player programs when you have multiple stages.

SDS

I was so bummed when I realized I sat on an Acuña card I could have sold for a lot more when the Braves collection didn’t earn any points for me in Stage 2. So I guess if you’re at 65 in a TA, and complete a team collection, you will only earn 5 instead of 10 TA points

SDS

... this is what you’re angry about?

SDS

@wingo18 said in Numbering in programs:

I was so bummed when I realized I sat on an Acuña card I could have sold for a lot more when the Braves collection didn’t earn any points for me in Stage 2. So I guess if you’re at 65 in a TA, and complete a team collection, you will only earn 5 instead of 10 TA points

If you did it before stage 2 then of course you wouldn't have went over 70. If you did it now then you would have the leftover points carry over to stage 2. This happened to me in stage 1 with the yankees collection but I wanted to finish the collections and wasn't willing to wait til stage 2 dropped.

SDS

@SchnauzerFace said in Numbering in programs:

... this is what you’re angry about?

I wouldn’t say angry. But it would be nice.

SDS

@wingo18 said in Numbering in programs:

I was so bummed when I realized I sat on an Acuña card I could have sold for a lot more when the Braves collection didn’t earn any points for me in Stage 2. So I guess if you’re at 65 in a TA, and complete a team collection, you will only earn 5 instead of 10 TA points

@wingo18 said in Numbering in programs:

I was so bummed when I realized I sat on an Acuña card I could have sold for a lot more when the Braves collection didn’t earn any points for me in Stage 2. So I guess if you’re at 65 in a TA, and complete a team collection, you will only earn 5 instead of 10 TA points

Nah you get the roll over to ta 2

Log in to reply