Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing

SDS

Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown

SDS

I wouldnt be surprised if we get something like this with stage 3 of of TA to help people catch up stage 1.

Basically compete stage 1 AL conquest get 10 points. Yes 10 points may not seem like alot but you have to balance out risk reward. Conquest has no risk so you get half the points of a showdown run

SDS

@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown

Why? You can play the stage 1 showdowns for 20 TA points per run and you can play March to October for even more. Why not just do either of those?

SDS

@raesONE said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown

Why? You can play the stage 1 showdowns for 20 TA points per run and you can play March to October for even more. Why not just do either of those?

because conquest is fun and doesn’t make me wanna throw my controller through the wall. Plus, people could grind stat missions too

SDS

@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

@raesONE said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown

Why? You can play the stage 1 showdowns for 20 TA points per run and you can play March to October for even more. Why not just do either of those?

because conquest is fun and doesn’t make me wanna throw my controller through the wall. Plus, people could grind stat missions too

And to play with the players we earned and want in our lineup. Not whatever randoms the showdown drafts have us pick.

SDS

I wish the stat missions would roll over, so when you get 40 innings it rolls over to a different one. I'm someone that likes small stat missions though.

Other than that it's fine as it is, and I'm someone that can't beat showdowns.

SDS

I'd like to see Conquest be repeatable up to 2 to 3x to earn 30 stars each as an alternative to Showdown.

SDS

While that would be nice, the points you get for showdown are the reward for going the harder route. They shouldn't reward people the same amount of points for taking the easy way out.

SDS

All good ideas. TA grinds are way too long unless you master Showdown. I have 7 teams still at S1. 20 points away on 2. But failed AL west 4 straight times yesterday. And to even get to 50 on a lot of these I had to do exchanges. I did MTO on like 7 or 8 years, so tired of that mode it's always the same.

I'm not asking for everything to be a stat grind like 18, but they seriously tied TA to Showdown, I'd like more ways to get TA points. Repeatable stat grinds IMO is where it should be.

SDS

I dont think the intention was ever to max out every team either. Personally I'm only working on about 5 teams. I've only got 2 up to 120 points.

SDS

@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

@raesONE said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

@DrackSaur said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

Title says it. We should have small, repeatable conquests that give you TA points. You’d have to conquer each division and you would make the same amount as you do in showdown

Why? You can play the stage 1 showdowns for 20 TA points per run and you can play March to October for even more. Why not just do either of those?

because conquest is fun and doesn’t make me wanna throw my controller through the wall. Plus, people could grind stat missions too

I think you have to balance it out and use all modes to your advantage. I use Conquest and MTO to progress my TAs along while racking up innings via events.

Also we are at a point now where I have started to put my duplicates to wards the exchanges because of the value of cards have drop where selling a silver is not worth it to me

SDS

Showdowns are single handedly the best place to get XP and stubs. You gotta just really lock in and get good enough to beat them consistently. No way you should want a way to not do them.

SDS

@maskedgrappler said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

I dont think the intention was ever to max out every team either. Personally I'm only working on about 5 teams. I've only got 2 up to 120 points.

I think this 100% true for the vast majority off people however life threw us a screwball and now everyone had time to get then all done.

I focus on one from each division to focus on for mission and exchanges once I hit 50 I move on.

SDS

I love conquest, but they probably won’t do this! Pretty much impossible to not beat a conquest map on first try. Showdown and MTO you can fail, so there is some risk. You can’t just get everything handed to you. Take the TA innings from conquest and be happy.

SDS

@nflman2033 said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

All good ideas. TA grinds are way too long unless you master Showdown. I have 7 teams still at S1. 20 points away on 2. But failed AL west 4 straight times yesterday. And to even get to 50 on a lot of these I had to do exchanges. I did MTO on like 7 or 8 years, so tired of that mode it's always the same.

I'm not asking for everything to be a stat grind like 18, but they seriously tied TA to Showdown, I'd like more ways to get TA points. Repeatable stat grinds IMO is where it should be.

It supposed to cater to your favorite teams not every team. I don’t think there intention was to be able to get all the teams complete each stage...

SDS

I dont see why it would have to be "instead of". I like the idea, they could implement it additionally. I like showdown, so prefer they keep it around.

SDS

What if they just made it 5 points per team stronghold on conquest and it's repeatable? That way you can only earn 5 points for that team per run through the map.

SDS

I see perhaps a turn based conquest going for a one and done affinity points but dont see much more than that. It sucks that showdown and M2O dont give you individual team innings for ta. People just want to double task.....like me....doing m2 O and also playing cpu games for my dailies since the conquest maps are almost done.

SDS

Agree, Conquest maps and and the occasional player program are what even keeps me on this game. It's def. the least aggravating part of the game

SDS

@DoIHearBossMusic said in Instead of showdown, repeatable conquest should be a thing:

Agree, Conquest maps and and the occasional player program are what even keeps me on this game. It's def. the least aggravating part of the game

I agree, those are really what I like about the game, everything is is a neccessary evil.

Log in to reply