@SefarR said in How close should this game have been?:
I'm going to share 4 PCI analysis images. If you do not mind, take a look at them and then look at the final score and give me your thoughts?
To put it in raw numbers:
I had 14 15's (4 hits, 10 outs) while my opponent had none. My opponent's hits were 10, 11, 12 and 13 hit chance. He hit one bomb with Snider (439 ft) and one with Griffey (388 ft). Both of his homers were early/okay.
Unable to tell with info given?
Those pictures don't tell the "whole story!" Where did the hits go after contact? What type of pitches did the hits come from?
What was the situation with the shift? What time of day? What ballpark? You understand why some people have a hard time reading peoples complaints about the game play?
When people constantly leave out information in order to come up with a reason why they should have won? Don't get me wrong I am not saying it didn't happen. But honestly how could anybody deduce whether you should have won or not with the info you provided.
The developers are always trying to make the game better but you cannot and should not expect them to know what happened in your game example with the information provided.
In fact you provided a picture of your opponents hits and it only shows 3 hits? The scoreboard says 7 hits and 4 hits so again info missing!