Best player in MLB not named Trout?

SDS

I'll go first, Juan Soto.

SDS

I’ll go Tatis

SDS

@raesONE said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

I'll go first, Juan Soto.

Hard not to agree

SDS

@Hikes83 said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

I’ll go Tatis

Not even a full season under his belt. Nor is he even the best player on his team nor the best SS in his division.

The most obvious choice is Justin Verlander for the last 3 years. Currently its Freddie Freeman or DJ Lemahieu

SDS

I'll say:

  1. Mike Trout
  2. Juan Soto
  3. Mookie Betts
SDS

FREDDIE!

SDS

@Ikasnu said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

@Hikes83 said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

I’ll go Tatis

Not even a full season under his belt. Nor is he even the best player on his team nor the best SS in his division.

The most obvious choice is Justin Verlander for the last 3 years. Currently its Freddie Freeman or DJ Lemahieu

Agree to disagree. If I’m a GM and want to build a team around a player not named Trout, It’s Tatis, Acuna or Soto. LeMahieu can be argued and Freeman is solid but no way part of the conversation. Acuna wayyyyy ahead of him

SDS

I would have said Cody Bellinger but he is having a not so good year this year.

SDS

@aparks87 said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

I'll say:

  1. Mike Trout
  2. Juan Soto
  3. Mookie Betts

Yeah Mookie is a solid pick too. Definitely can be argued he belongs

SDS

The Market says:

  1. Verlander - 169,999 Buy Now
  2. DeGrom - 164,880
  3. Trout - 158,500

So... according to this... Trout isn't even the best player. The question should have been "Best player not named Verlander".

The Market has spoken.

SDS

@arvcpa said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

The Market says:

  1. Verlander - 169,999 Buy Now
  2. DeGrom - 164,880
  3. Trout - 158,500

So... according to this... Trout isn't even the best player. The question should have been "Best player not named Verlander".

The Market has spoken.

The market really is weird right now.

SDS

@raesONE said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

The market really is weird right now.

Yes it is. But it is the only source of reliable information on the entire Internet. I looked.

SDS

Firm believer in Acuna having a crazy good career, also will take him as the best player not named Trout.

SDS

@raesONE said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

@arvcpa said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

The Market says:

  1. Verlander - 169,999 Buy Now
  2. DeGrom - 164,880
  3. Trout - 158,500

So... according to this... Trout isn't even the best player. The question should have been "Best player not named Verlander".

The Market has spoken.

The market really is weird right now.

First time I’ve seen Trout not being most expensive LS card in 5 years

SDS

If I’m starting a franchise today I might consider starting it with Robert

SDS

@Gbobnick said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

If I’m starting a franchise today I might consider starting it with Robert

I would too, even though he's been slumping lately. 5 tool player for sure, tons of potential.

SDS

@Hikes83 said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

@Ikasnu said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

@Hikes83 said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

I’ll go Tatis

Not even a full season under his belt. Nor is he even the best player on his team nor the best SS in his division.

The most obvious choice is Justin Verlander for the last 3 years. Currently its Freddie Freeman or DJ Lemahieu

Agree to disagree. If I’m a GM and want to build a team around a player not named Trout, It’s Tatis, Acuna or Soto. LeMahieu can be argued and Freeman is solid but no way part of the conversation. Acuna wayyyyy ahead of him

If we're building a franchise, absolutely agree with you. But in terms of the best right now its the ones I listed.

SDS

Acuna with the sleeper being Luis Robert (I see huge things ahead for him and the White Sox are lucky to have him)

SDS

This is based on nothing and I’m not a hater but I have a gut feeling Acuna fizzles out

SDS

@Hikes83 said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

@raesONE said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

@arvcpa said in Best player in MLB not named Trout?:

The Market says:

  1. Verlander - 169,999 Buy Now
  2. DeGrom - 164,880
  3. Trout - 158,500

So... according to this... Trout isn't even the best player. The question should have been "Best player not named Verlander".

The Market has spoken.

The market really is weird right now.

First time I’ve seen Trout not being most expensive LS card in 5 years

Thats definitely not true. Mookie was more expensive than Trout for the last 4 months of both 18 and 19

Log in to reply