Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you may not be able to execute some actions.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
Ive hit him twice so far.
Don't care what you say, those Hernandez moments are cruel.
Nice try Ramone
It's hard to gauge how good any reliever is in this game when they all get tired after 5 pitches.
They noticed everyone using minor league stadiums and thought we all must love MiLB.
too bad so sad
Not how odds work
Ok, but top players comprise 0.5% of the population, why only cater to them?
Maybe next month they can put out a 99 future legend card
@jonblaze2424 said in Dawson:
Thats wild, i was just thinking how easy the hernandez moments were. The guy is a base hitting machine. Always interesting to see how people struggle with different players.
Well, he is a base hitting machine. Unfortunately he's not an extra base hitting machine.
The pitching ones are mostly on rookie. If you can't strike out 90% of the batters on rookie I'm not sure what to say.
Everyone in the 500-600s quits as soon as they go down a couple runs anyway. I've got a decent bullpen, but I only get to use it when I'm losing.
I opened 20 of them the other day. Pulled Sale, Mookie, and Bellinger, then sold all the golds for another 60-70k.
@JediGeronimo said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?":
@maskedgrappler said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": @BodamEscapePlan said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": @JediGeronimo said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": @BodamEscapePlan said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": Just wondering, as I saw a lot of people anticipating that's who it would be. Personally, I would never use a card that isn't an actual baseball player even if it was "based on" one of the all-time greats. It has to be the named player, in my opinion. this is a joke thread right? No, I'm being totally serious about that. I wouldn't use a player with a fake name, even if it were based on a legendary player. I can't be the only one surely? Maybe you're misunderstanding me though, I wouldn't lock in all these cards to get "Reggie Stocker." With so many other legends that have their likeness in full, I just wouldn't feel compelled to go after a card like that. I'm with you . I wouldn't use fake players either. Made up attributes on real players are bad enough. you're a "fake player" and you use yourself everyday
@maskedgrappler said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?":
@BodamEscapePlan said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": @JediGeronimo said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": @BodamEscapePlan said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": Just wondering, as I saw a lot of people anticipating that's who it would be. Personally, I would never use a card that isn't an actual baseball player even if it was "based on" one of the all-time greats. It has to be the named player, in my opinion. this is a joke thread right? No, I'm being totally serious about that. I wouldn't use a player with a fake name, even if it were based on a legendary player. I can't be the only one surely? Maybe you're misunderstanding me though, I wouldn't lock in all these cards to get "Reggie Stocker." With so many other legends that have their likeness in full, I just wouldn't feel compelled to go after a card like that. I'm with you . I wouldn't use fake players either. Made up attributes on real players are bad enough.
@BodamEscapePlan said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?":
@JediGeronimo said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": @BodamEscapePlan said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": Just wondering, as I saw a lot of people anticipating that's who it would be. Personally, I would never use a card that isn't an actual baseball player even if it was "based on" one of the all-time greats. It has to be the named player, in my opinion. this is a joke thread right? No, I'm being totally serious about that. I wouldn't use a player with a fake name, even if it were based on a legendary player. I can't be the only one surely? Maybe you're misunderstanding me though, I wouldn't lock in all these cards to get "Reggie Stocker." With so many other legends that have their likeness in full, I just wouldn't feel compelled to go after a card like that.
@BodamEscapePlan said in Would you have been more excited if the Collections reward was "Reggie Stocker?": Just wondering, as I saw a lot of people anticipating that's who it would be. Personally, I would never use a card that isn't an actual baseball player even if it was "based on" one of the all-time greats. It has to be the named player, in my opinion. this is a joke thread right?
Just wondering, as I saw a lot of people anticipating that's who it would be. Personally, I would never use a card that isn't an actual baseball player even if it was "based on" one of the all-time greats. It has to be the named player, in my opinion.
Just wondering, as I saw a lot of people anticipating that's who it would be.
Personally, I would never use a card that isn't an actual baseball player even if it was "based on" one of the all-time greats. It has to be the named player, in my opinion.
this is a joke thread right?
No, I'm being totally serious about that. I wouldn't use a player with a fake name, even if it were based on a legendary player.
I can't be the only one surely? Maybe you're misunderstanding me though, I wouldn't lock in all these cards to get "Reggie Stocker." With so many other legends that have their likeness in full, I just wouldn't feel compelled to go after a card like that.
I'm with you . I wouldn't use fake players either. Made up attributes on real players are bad enough.
you're a "fake player" and you use yourself everyday
Witty
Keep setting yourselves up guys.
People just get their expectations out of whack. When you work yourself up to think you're getting Bonds or Aaron or Randy Johnson it's going to be a disappointment when it turns out to be a guy that already has a 95 rated card in the game.
@PapaBaboo721 said in Joe Kelly is a bonafide Troll:
@Matt_42187 said in Joe Kelly is a bonafide Troll: @VeganMeatbawls said in Joe Kelly is a bonafide Troll: No matter who no matter what the situation I think pitcher's should always be humble when successful. Hitting a baseball is the toughest thing to do in sports and under no circumstances should you be rubbing it in it's just not a very classy thing to do. But when signs are stolen and know what is coming, it’s pretty easy to sit on the pitch. That’s why Carlos had a career year in 2017. What were his numbers in 18’ & 19’ without stealing? out side of his injuries? who cares about the past with this story. i get it they cheated, BUT they still won whether or not people recognize it its done. cool put an * the players and fans still have the memory and feeling of winning. no one cares what came after lol also hes crushing right now and that cheating crutch is bending.
@Matt_42187 said in Joe Kelly is a bonafide Troll:
@VeganMeatbawls said in Joe Kelly is a bonafide Troll: No matter who no matter what the situation I think pitcher's should always be humble when successful. Hitting a baseball is the toughest thing to do in sports and under no circumstances should you be rubbing it in it's just not a very classy thing to do. But when signs are stolen and know what is coming, it’s pretty easy to sit on the pitch. That’s why Carlos had a career year in 2017. What were his numbers in 18’ & 19’ without stealing?
@VeganMeatbawls said in Joe Kelly is a bonafide Troll:
No matter who no matter what the situation I think pitcher's should always be humble when successful. Hitting a baseball is the toughest thing to do in sports and under no circumstances should you be rubbing it in it's just not a very classy thing to do.
But when signs are stolen and know what is coming, it’s pretty easy to sit on the pitch. That’s why Carlos had a career year in 2017. What were his numbers in 18’ & 19’ without stealing?
out side of his injuries? who cares about the past with this story. i get it they cheated, BUT they still won whether or not people recognize it its done. cool put an * the players and fans still have the memory and feeling of winning. no one cares what came after lol also hes crushing right now and that cheating crutch is bending.
At this point people are less angry that they cheated and more angry at the classless way they are still acting about it to this day.
Its unbelievable the luck this team has, first to get off scot free, then to not have fans booing them out of the building every night.
@taterracing said in Collection Theory:
@maskedgrappler said in Collection Theory: @taterracing said in Collection Theory: @maskedgrappler said in Collection Theory: @taterracing said in Collection Theory: I think there's more coming down the road See, this is a prime example of you guys setting yourselves up for disappointment. Nah. I'm one to keep my cards, anyway, regardless on if I use them. I dunno, this Trout is great and all, but not nearly as good as Wagner last year. And this collection was far, far easier to complete. We'll see. As I said earlier, I'm sure it was far easier because sds saw a miniscule number of people unlock Honus. I thought that was the point, though. I eventually got Honus last year, but took a month after it dropped. I kind of enjoyed the hunt.
@maskedgrappler said in Collection Theory:
@taterracing said in Collection Theory: @maskedgrappler said in Collection Theory: @taterracing said in Collection Theory: I think there's more coming down the road See, this is a prime example of you guys setting yourselves up for disappointment. Nah. I'm one to keep my cards, anyway, regardless on if I use them. I dunno, this Trout is great and all, but not nearly as good as Wagner last year. And this collection was far, far easier to complete. We'll see. As I said earlier, I'm sure it was far easier because sds saw a miniscule number of people unlock Honus.
@maskedgrappler said in Collection Theory: @taterracing said in Collection Theory: I think there's more coming down the road See, this is a prime example of you guys setting yourselves up for disappointment. Nah. I'm one to keep my cards, anyway, regardless on if I use them. I dunno, this Trout is great and all, but not nearly as good as Wagner last year. And this collection was far, far easier to complete. We'll see.
@taterracing said in Collection Theory: I think there's more coming down the road See, this is a prime example of you guys setting yourselves up for disappointment.
I think there's more coming down the road
See, this is a prime example of you guys setting yourselves up for disappointment.
Nah. I'm one to keep my cards, anyway, regardless on if I use them. I dunno, this Trout is great and all, but not nearly as good as Wagner last year. And this collection was far, far easier to complete. We'll see.
As I said earlier, I'm sure it was far easier because sds saw a miniscule number of people unlock Honus.
I thought that was the point, though. I eventually got Honus last year, but took a month after it dropped. I kind of enjoyed the hunt.
It was, but I doubt they want to put out content that only 2% of their players can use.
I'm not defending it or anything, but just like making showdowns easier, this was done through user data.
